presents
Voter's Edge California Voter Guide
Conozca la información antes de votar.
Presentado por
MapLight
League of Women Voters of California Education Fund
California Common Cause@CommonCauseCA
June 7, 2016 — Elecciones Primarias de California

Asamblea Estatal de CaliforniaCandidato para Distrito 6

Photo de Suzanne Jones

Suzanne Jones

Síndico, comisionado, mediador
4,397 votos (3.3%)
Use tab to activate the candidate button. Use "return" to select this candidate. You can access your list by navigating to 'My Choices'.
Para obtener más información a fondo sobre este candidato, siga los enlaces de cada pestaña en esta sección. En la mayoría de los lectores de pantalla, puede presionar Regresar o Ingresar para entrar a una pestaña y leer el contenido.
El candidato(a) proporcionó información.
Agradezca al candidato por compartir su información en Voter’s Edge.

Mis 3 prioridades principales

  • Disminuir el "estado regulatorio" y reducir la carga tributaria que está expulsando de California a los negocios y las oportunidades.
  • Abordar la infraestructura que se está derrumbando del transporte y el agua en California. Detener la fantasía del tren bala que no desea nadie y que no podemos pagar.
  • Restaurar la excelencia de las escuelas: evitar que las escuelas promuevan los esquemas de ingeniería social de lo políticamente correcto (Political Correctness, PC), detener la federalización de los planes de estudio y garantizar una voz más fuerte

Experiencia

Experiencia

Profesión:Fideicomisario de la Junta Escolar, comisionado, mediador
Trustee, Placer County Board of Education — Cargo elegido (2010–current)
Board Member, Past Chair, Granite Bay Municipal Advisory Council — Cargo designado (2011–current)
Mediator, APPELLATE MEDIATION PROGRAM COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT — Cargo designado (2012–current)
Commissioner, Placer County Older Adult Advisory Commission — Cargo designado (2013–current)
Member, California County Boards of Education Legislation Committee — Cargo designado (2012–2016)
Legal Analyst III, Sacramento City Unified School District (2006–2009)
Management Analyst, Dept of the Army, Office of the Program Manager, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (1997–2001)
Owner/Operator, Decorating Den Interior Décor, Granite Bay, CA (1994–1996)
Investigative Operations Assistant/Criminal Intelligence Coordinator, US Army Criminal Investigation Command, Fort Ord, CA (1991–1992)
Chief, Administrative Services Support Branch, US Army Criminal Investigations Command, Heidelberg, German (1988–1991)

Educación

California Bar Association California Bar Card, Law (2006)
Lincoln Law School of Sacramento J.D., Law (2005)
California State University, Sacramento B.A., Major: Human Biology, Minor: Chemistry (1981)

Actividades comunitarias

Elected Member, Placer County Republican Central Committee (2015–current)
Member, Placer County Republican Assembly (2012–current)
Member, Sacramento, El Dorado County Republican Assemblies (2014–current)
Associate Member, American River Republican Women Federated (2010–current)
Associate Member, Auburn Area, South Placer and El Dorado Hills-West Republican Women Federated (2012–current)

Preguntas y Respuestas

Preguntas de The League of Women Voters of California Education Fund and California Counts, a public media collaboration. (4)

Climate changes and the continuing drought worry many in California. What new strategies do you believe would ensure that California is able to both satisfy its water needs and protect the environment? Please be specific. 
Respuesta de Suzanne Jones:

Reassesment of the Environmental Protection laws.

Many of the Environmental Protection laws preclude reasonable water management, building additional water storage, and destroy our farm lands.

Many Californians are concerned about the influence of money in politics. What can the state legislature do to ensure that decision-making by elected officials is not swayed by moneyed interests at the expense of constituents?
Respuesta de Suzanne Jones:

It is not up to the Legislature to pass new laws restricting or limiting campaign contributions.

It is up to the voters to not elect candidates that are corrupted by the big money and heavy influence of wealthy speciual interes groups.

It is up to the voters to express their outrage and get the corrupt system of big campaign contributors changed.

There are a variety of proposals to raise California's minimum wage. Many of these proposals face opposition from business groups who are concerned that they would kill jobs. Do you support increasing the minimum wage in California?  In your answer please explain your position on the relationship between wages and jobs with specific reference to the situation in your district. 
Respuesta de Suzanne Jones:

Minimum Wage increases will destroy minimum wage jobs because employers will be forced to reduce employee workforce as a result of the added expense; 

 

The minimun wage increase is responsible for the innovation of new automation that will replace minimum wage employees where ever possible.

 

I do not support increasing minimum wage.  I support bringing businesses back to California, that will bring good jobs back.  

I support returning ooportunity to California so that people can become entrepeneurs and aspire to make more than just minimum wage.

What are your top three fiscal priorities, recognizing the need to balance the state’s income with its spending?
Respuesta de Suzanne Jones:

1.  Return Quality to our public school education.

2.  Reduce onerous taxation and regulations on both taxpayers and small businesses.

3.  Restore public safety by repealing both prop 109 and reverse some of the crime declassifications in prop 47.

¿Quién proporcionó dinero a este candidato?

Contribuciones

Dinero total recaudado: $52,494

Principales contribuyentes que dieron dinero para apoyar al candidato, por organización:

1
Employees of JONES, SUZANNE V.
$12,800
2
Employees of Mike Spelis
$6,600
3
California Trailblazers
$2,200
4
Sharif Jewelers
$1,785
5
Employees of Innovative Energy Services
$1,000
5
Lincoln Law School of Sacramento
$1,000

Más información acerca de contribuciones

Por estado:

California 98.55%
Nevada 0.93%
Virginia 0.52%
98.55%

Por tamaño:

Contribuciones grandes (92.26%)
Contribuciones pequeñas (7.74%)
92.26%

Por tipo:

De organizaciones (16.95%)
De individuos (83.05%)
16.95%83.05%
Fuente: Análisis de datos de la Secretaría del Estado de California de MapLight.

Información de contacto del candidato

Comparta este sitio para ayudar a otras personas a investigar sus opciones para las votaciones.

PUBLISHING:PRODUCTION SERVER:PRODUCTION